It has an interesting premise but played out in plenty of graphic strong groey violence that I feel like older teens can handle, but as for new teens/older tweens, don't let them watch. This movie is totally for entertainment vaule and nothing more than that. Granted this is a 2000s movie, but this movie is graphic with the violence, and not to mention, it has absoulutely zero good messages/role models besides the theme, "cheat death to live." It is more than a comfortable watch, and it can be graphic to the point it can be sickenning to see. it is the violence that sometimes its too much. From the original one to the Final Destination 5 in 2011, the franchise has followed the death itself. In 2000, James Wong released the first movie of the supernatural horror series. It is the violence that is more than comfortable to see. The Final Destination franchise applied an old formula to make its place in the pantheon of classic horror franchises. Everyone says this should 14+, but in my opinion, it is should be at least the minium of 16+. From the beginning to the end, there is countless deaths played out in gorey strong violence that young kids shouldn't see, and not to mention it plenty of strong profane language. Nothing about this movie is partiuclar scary or haunting, but the worst part of this film (and the whole series) is how strong the violence is. It's more of a gore, violence fest type of movie. This is a horror movie right? Well, it really isn't if I'm to be honest.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |